Listen to this post

On February 17, 2023, the U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights (“OCR”) released three new resources regarding equal opportunity in athletic programs under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (“Title IX”).  The new resources are designed to help schools, as well as students and parents, evaluate whether an athletic program satisfies the requirements of Title IX.  

Specifically, public elementary and secondary schools, as well as colleges, universities, and other schools that receive federal funding (collectively, “schools”), have an obligation under Title IX to provide equal athletic opportunities to all students, regardless of sex. As such, schools must effectively accommodate the athletic interests and abilities of their students, regardless of sex, and provide equal opportunity in the benefits, opportunities, and treatment afforded to their athletic teams.   

The new resources, which summarize but do not change any existing legal requirements, can be described as follows:

  • Title IX and Athletic Opportunities in K-12 Schools explains students’ right to participate in interscholastic, intramural, or club athletic programs free from discrimination based on sex.  It also provides an overview of how to evaluate whether a school is (1) meeting students’ athletic interests and abilities and (2) providing equivalent benefits, opportunities, and treatment for its boys’ and girls’ teams.  This latter analysis involves a review of many factors, including equipment and supplies, game and practice time schedules, travel and daily allowances, coaching, locker rooms and practice and competition facilities, medical and training facilities and services, and publicity.  As explained by OCR, schools must consider booster club support for their athletic teams when evaluating the equivalence of benefits, opportunities, and treatment afforded to boys and girls in their athletic program.
  • Title IX and Athletic Opportunities in Colleges and Universities explains students’ rights to participate in intercollegiate, intramural, or club athletic programs free from discrimination based on sex.  For college and university athletics programs, Title IX compliance is assessed by examining: (1) how the school meets students’ athletic interests and abilities, (2) how the school awards athletic scholarships and financial assistance, and (3) the benefits, opportunities, and treatment provided to men’s and women’s teams.  OCR will look at many factors to determine whether the school offers equivalent benefits, opportunities, and treatment, including equipment and supplies, game and practice time schedules, travel and daily allowances, coaching, academic tutors, locker rooms and practice and competition facilities, medical and training facilities and services, housing and dining services, publicity, and recruitment activities.  In addition, OCR will consider the contributions of booster clubs and other organizations and individuals when evaluating whether the benefits, opportunities, and treatment are equivalent for both men and women in a school’s athletic program.

Schools are advised to utilize these new resources to help them review their athletic programs holistically for compliance with Title IX.  If you have any questions about your program’s Title IX obligations, please contact Dori Pagé Antonetti at dantonetti@goodwin.com, Julie Jaquays at jjaquays@goodwin.com, or Jessica Richman Smith at jsmith@goodwin.com.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Dori Pagé Antonetti Dori Pagé Antonetti

Dori Pagé Antonetti is a member of the School Law Practice Group where she represents a wide range of educational institutions, including both public and independent k-12 schools in a variety of education and employment law matters.  In her day-to-day representation of clients…

Dori Pagé Antonetti is a member of the School Law Practice Group where she represents a wide range of educational institutions, including both public and independent k-12 schools in a variety of education and employment law matters.  In her day-to-day representation of clients, Dori draws on her unique experience as a former educator for Teach for America.  This experience, coupled with her time as a hearing review officer for the New York City Office of Labor Relations, allows Dori to analyze issues from a practical perspective, which brings significant advantages to her clients.

Most recently, Dori’s practice has focused on assisting school districts and independent schools with various aspects of COVID-19 pandemic response and preparedness and return-to-school planning.  Dori has provided guidance on the requirements and implementation of ever-evolving federal and state laws and guidelines in various areas, such as employee leave, vaccine mandates, mask rules, health and safety protocols, telehealth, and sports-related issues.

Dori is a thoughtful attorney who has astute peripheral vision which allows her to help school clients identify legal issues and develop creative solutions.  She is attentive to detail, careful, and thorough.  Dori has extensive experience in policy development and review, and enjoys helping clients ensure that their policies and regulations are legally compliant, clearly written, and accomplish their intended purpose.  She also regularly advises schools on their obligations and responsibilities under the Family and Medical Leave Act and Americans with Disabilities Act.  For independent school clients, Dori has extensive experience drafting and revising enrollment contracts, faculty/staff handbooks, employment contracts and advising on issues such as truth-in-lending obligations, federal funding, vaccine policies and exemption issues.

Photo of Julie C. Fay Julie C. Fay

Julie is co-chair of Shipman’s Education Department, and a partner in the School Law Practice group, where she represents public and independent schools in a variety of special education and general education law matters, with a particular focus on issues relating to students…

Julie is co-chair of Shipman’s Education Department, and a partner in the School Law Practice group, where she represents public and independent schools in a variety of special education and general education law matters, with a particular focus on issues relating to students with disabilities, student discipline, confidentiality, school governance and policy. Julie frequently represents schools in administrative hearings, including expulsion hearings, special education due process hearings and related proceedings, and is often called upon to guide districts in drafting policies and administrative procedures in all education law areas. As part of her practice, Julie has conducted numerous professional development workshops for clients and other school organizations.

Photo of Julie P. Reznik Julie P. Reznik

Julie Reznik is a member of the firm’s School Law Practice Group. She advises public school districts on a variety of general education, special education and labor and employment issues. Julie focuses her practice on special education matters and disputes, student discipline, and…

Julie Reznik is a member of the firm’s School Law Practice Group. She advises public school districts on a variety of general education, special education and labor and employment issues. Julie focuses her practice on special education matters and disputes, student discipline, and the Connecticut Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). She also serves on the firm’s Model Policy Committee, which provides a comprehensive set of model policies and administrative regulations, as well as model notifications and forms, for Connecticut boards of education and charter schools.

Photo of Jessica Richman Smith Jessica Richman Smith

Jessica represents schools in a variety of education, labor relations and employment law matters.  She negotiates certified and non-certified collective bargaining agreements on behalf of numerous public boards of education.  Jessica also represents school districts in labor and employment disputes, freedom of information…

Jessica represents schools in a variety of education, labor relations and employment law matters.  She negotiates certified and non-certified collective bargaining agreements on behalf of numerous public boards of education.  Jessica also represents school districts in labor and employment disputes, freedom of information hearings, teacher tenure proceedings, student disciplinary matters, election law matters, and other legal proceedings arising in the education context.  In addition, Jessica advises schools on education policies and practices, compliance with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act and the Connecticut Freedom of Information Act, and other legal matters arising in the education context.