Listen to this post

On September 28, 2026, the U.S. Department of Education finalized a rule that removes the 2024 Title IX regulations and officially brings back the 2020 version, which governs how schools handle complaints of sex discrimination, including sexual harassment, under federal law. Here is what K-12 and higher education leaders need to know.

What the Rule Does

From a practical standpoint, not much has changed since the 2024 Title IX regulations were declared invalid by a federal district court in Kentucky on January 9, 2025, a move that immediately reinstated the 2020 Title IX regulations. Accordingly, the Department has been operating under the 2020 Title IX regulations since early 2025, even before making this change official. However, the new rule formally restores the 2020 Title IX framework, which requires schools to follow a specific grievance process when responding to complaints of sexual harassment.

This grievance process includes, among other things, providing parties with the opportunity to review evidence and pose questions to other parties and witnesses; allowing parties to have an advisor of their choice, who may be, but is not required to be, an attorney; requiring separate investigators, decision-makers, and appeal decision-makers, each of whom must serve without bias or a conflict of interest; allowing institutions to choose to apply a higher standard of proof; and imposing any discipline only if, and after, the grievance process has been fully implemented and completed.

Complaints of sex discrimination that do not involve sexual harassment may still be investigated using grievance procedures that are less complex and look more like those used to investigate other forms of discrimination in a school setting.

What the Rule Does Not Do

This rule does not define “sex” under Title IX. However, the Department is currently interpreting “sex” as solely biological sex and declining to extend Title IX’s protections to cover gender identity or sexual orientation. A separate rulemaking effort is expected to formally define “sex” under Title IX.

Key Takeaways for K-12 Schools and Institutions of Higher Education

K-12 and higher education leaders should consider the following steps:

  • Check your complaint and investigation procedures to make sure they align with the 2020 Title IX regulations.
  • Stay alert for updates on the definition of “sex” under Title IX, which could have practical implications for schools.
Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Julia V. Wilde Julia V. Wilde

Julia Wilde advises public school districts on a variety of general education, special education and labor and employment issues. Prior to joining Shipman & Goodwin, Julia served as Assistant Corporation Counsel for the City of Hartford, where she advised the City on a…

Julia Wilde advises public school districts on a variety of general education, special education and labor and employment issues. Prior to joining Shipman & Goodwin, Julia served as Assistant Corporation Counsel for the City of Hartford, where she advised the City on a variety of legal matters, with an emphasis on public education, special education and labor and employment. In addition, she has worked for several law firms in Massachusetts.

Photo of Gwen J. Zittoun Gwen J. Zittoun

Gwen represents boards of education in relation to special education, Section 504, restraint and seclusion, student discipline, board policy development and revision, and general education matters. Gwen frequently speaks on education issues, including privacy and confidentiality of student information, bullying and Section 504.

Photo of Jessica Richman Smith Jessica Richman Smith

Jessica represents schools in a variety of education, labor relations and employment law matters.  She negotiates certified and non-certified collective bargaining agreements on behalf of numerous public boards of education.  Jessica also represents school districts in labor and employment disputes, freedom of information…

Jessica represents schools in a variety of education, labor relations and employment law matters.  She negotiates certified and non-certified collective bargaining agreements on behalf of numerous public boards of education.  Jessica also represents school districts in labor and employment disputes, freedom of information hearings, teacher tenure proceedings, student disciplinary matters, election law matters, and other legal proceedings arising in the education context.  In addition, Jessica advises schools on education policies and practices, compliance with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act and the Connecticut Freedom of Information Act, and other legal matters arising in the education context.

Photo of Tom Owen Tom Owen

Tom Owen works with schools and colleges on legal issues related to students, employees, governance, and policy. He draws on his previous career in education to offer practical legal guidance to school leaders. Tom holds a J.D. from Northeastern University School of Law…

Tom Owen works with schools and colleges on legal issues related to students, employees, governance, and policy. He draws on his previous career in education to offer practical legal guidance to school leaders. Tom holds a J.D. from Northeastern University School of Law, an M.A. in private school leadership from the Klingenstein Center for Independent School Leadership at Columbia University’s Teachers College, and an A.B. in comparative literature from Dartmouth College.