Listen to this post

On April 24, 2024, the United States Department of Justice (“DOJ”) published its much-anticipated final rule regarding website and mobile app accessibility for state and local governments.  The new rule, which implements Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), has specific requirements to ensure that web content and mobile apps are accessible to and usable by people with disabilities.  The new requirements are binding on state and local governments, including school districts, and they apply to web content and mobile apps that a public entity provides or makes available directly or through contractual, licensing, or other arrangements.

New Technical Standards

The DOJ adopted the 2018 version of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (“WCAG”) 2.1[1] as the technical standard for web content and mobile app accessibility that state and local governments must follow to ensure they meet existing obligations under Title II of the ADA.  The rule further states that public entities will need to comply with the WCAG 2.1 Level AA success criteria and conformance requirements. State and local governments, including school districts, will need to make sure that websites, mobile apps, and other materials – such as digital textbooks — comply with these standards unless doing so would alter the nature of the services, program or activity offered or cause an undue administrative or financial burden.  Public entities should be aware that these are rigorous standards.

Exceptions

The final rule provides five exceptions, some of which we pointed out in our August 16, 2023 article, in which we discussed the DOJ’s proposed rule. The exceptions include.

  • Archived web content;
  • Preexisting conventional electronic documents, unless such documents are currently used to apply for, gain access to, or participate in the public entity’s services, programs, or activities;
  • Content posted by a third party on the public entity’s website, unless the third party is posting due to contractual, licensing, or other arrangements with the public entity;
  • Conventional electronic documents that are individualized and password-protected or otherwise secure; and
  • Preexisting social media posts.

Notably, if an exception applies, the public entity need not comply with the WCAG technical standards for that content.  However, upon request from a specific individual, a public entity may have to provide the web content or content in mobile apps to that individual in an accessible format to comply with the entity’s existing obligations under other regulatory provisions implementing Title II of the ADA.

Timeline for Compliance

The DOJ recognizes that small public entities may face challenges implementing the proposed requirements due to limited resources. As a result, the timeframe for compliance varies by population. State and local governments in a county or city with a total population of 50,000 or more must comply with this rule by April 24, 2026, while those with 49,999 or fewer must comply by April 24, 2027.

_________________

[1] WCAG 2.1 means the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (‘‘WCAG’’) 2.1, W3C Recommendation 05 June 2018, https://perma.cc/UB8A–GG2F.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Dori Pagé Antonetti Dori Pagé Antonetti

Dori Pagé Antonetti is a member of the School Law Practice Group where she represents a wide range of educational institutions, including both public and independent k-12 schools in a variety of education and employment law matters.  In her day-to-day representation of clients…

Dori Pagé Antonetti is a member of the School Law Practice Group where she represents a wide range of educational institutions, including both public and independent k-12 schools in a variety of education and employment law matters.  In her day-to-day representation of clients, Dori draws on her unique experience as a former educator for Teach for America.  This experience, coupled with her time as a hearing review officer for the New York City Office of Labor Relations, allows Dori to analyze issues from a practical perspective, which brings significant advantages to her clients.

Most recently, Dori’s practice has focused on assisting school districts and independent schools with various aspects of COVID-19 pandemic response and preparedness and return-to-school planning.  Dori has provided guidance on the requirements and implementation of ever-evolving federal and state laws and guidelines in various areas, such as employee leave, vaccine mandates, mask rules, health and safety protocols, telehealth, and sports-related issues.

Dori is a thoughtful attorney who has astute peripheral vision which allows her to help school clients identify legal issues and develop creative solutions.  She is attentive to detail, careful, and thorough.  Dori has extensive experience in policy development and review, and enjoys helping clients ensure that their policies and regulations are legally compliant, clearly written, and accomplish their intended purpose.  She also regularly advises schools on their obligations and responsibilities under the Family and Medical Leave Act and Americans with Disabilities Act.  For independent school clients, Dori has extensive experience drafting and revising enrollment contracts, faculty/staff handbooks, employment contracts and advising on issues such as truth-in-lending obligations, federal funding, vaccine policies and exemption issues.

Photo of Rauchell Beckford-Anderson Rauchell Beckford-Anderson

Rauchell is a member of the firm’s Employer Defense and Labor Relations practice group. She represents employers in all employment law matters before the Connecticut Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and state and federal court. Her experience…

Rauchell is a member of the firm’s Employer Defense and Labor Relations practice group. She represents employers in all employment law matters before the Connecticut Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and state and federal court. Her experience includes defending public and private sector employers in employment-related litigation including wrongful termination, discrimination, retaliation, sexual harassment, and wage claims.

Photo of Peter J. Maher Peter J. Maher

Peter Maher represents boards of education and other entities in all areas of school law, with an emphasis on special education issues, labor and employment matters and, more recently, issues related to school operations during the COVID-19 pandemic. A former educator, Peter draws…

Peter Maher represents boards of education and other entities in all areas of school law, with an emphasis on special education issues, labor and employment matters and, more recently, issues related to school operations during the COVID-19 pandemic. A former educator, Peter draws on his firsthand knowledge of the needs and goals of school stakeholders to provide practical, community-specific and timely counsel that helps prevent problems when possible and solve them when necessary. Whether navigating sensitive special education matters or advising on day-to-day district operations, he partners with his clients to identify opportunities and pursue a clear path in the face of today’s challenges.