Listen to this post

Originally appeared in the CAS Weekly Newsletter

Guest Columnists: Dori Pagé Antonetti and Jessica Richman Smith

Dear Legal Mailbag,

I am an assistant principal at a high school, and like many educators across Connecticut, I have been working to understand the requirements and intentions of our state’s new challenging behavior legislation. My colleagues and I are committed to compliance, but we are struggling with how broadly these rules apply in day-to-day school discipline.

Specifically, we are unsure whether the challenging behavior documentation requirements extend to routine disciplinary matters. For example, when a student is suspended for any reason, such as vaping, skipping a Saturday detention, or other straightforward code-of-conduct violations, are we obligated to complete the state’s challenging behavior documentation form just because they are suspended and removed from their educational setting? Some districts seem to interpret the law as requiring a form for every suspension, while others believe the legislation is intended only for situations involving persistent or escalating behaviors that significantly impede learning or safety.

Before we overburden staff with unnecessary work, we are hoping you can clarify the legislative purpose. Was the challenging behavior statute truly designed to cover ordinary disciplinary offenses, or should it in fact be used exclusively for behaviors that reflect deeper emotional or behavioral dysregulation within classrooms?

Signed,

Drowning in Forms

Dear Drowning:

Legal Mailbag wants to assure you that if you have one (or fifty) questions about the new school climate laws, you are not alone! Whether intended or not, the new requirements to address “challenging behavior” have come with many challenges of their own. We hope our guidance will help keep you and your colleagues afloat as you revise your procedures to reflect these statutory changes. While this may not be the response you were hoping for, Legal Mailbag concludes that the challenging behavior statute applies to all incidents of challenging behavior, even behaviors that are not especially serious. The good news, however, is that school employees are not required to report challenging behavior to the School Climate Specialist if the behavior does not result in disciplinary action. The further good news is that even when a report is required, using a specific form is not. 

As you may know, boards of education have been required to adopt plans to address school climate since 2002, and over the years, the law has been revised many times. This time, the legislature not only redefined bullying but included a new term, “challenging behavior,” thereby broadening the types of behavior that school districts must monitor and address.  

In the first instance, it is important for school districts to understand that challenging behavior is broadly defined as “behavior that negatively impacts school climate or interferes, or is at risk of interfering, with the learning or safety of a student or the safety of a school employee”. Fortunately, school employees need not report every incident of challenging behavior to the School Climate Specialist; many of these behaviors will likely be handled through classroom management techniques and established instructional practices. However, under the new law, school employees must notify the School Climate Specialist of any incidents of challenging behavior that result in student discipline, which is defined under state law to include removal from the classroom, in-school suspension, out-of-school suspension, or expulsion. This holds true whether a student is being disciplined for “straightforward code-of-conduct violations” (to use your description), or infractions that seem more directly related to a serious disruption of school climate.  

The law does not, however, require school employees to fill out a form for every disruption that involves challenging behavior when discipline is not imposed. Employees have discretion in referring the matter to the School Climate Specialist when an incident does not result in discipline and has been addressed through classroom management. 

Legal Mailbag further notes that the law does not mandate the use of any particular form even when a challenging behavior referral is required. Districts can adopt regulations or procedures that outline how school employees may notify the School Climate Specialist of challenging behavior incidents. That process might involve using a complaint form, such as the uniform challenging behavior and/or bullying complaint form developed by the Social and Emotional Learning and School Climate Advisory Collaborative, but that is not a legal mandate. Indeed, Legal Mailbag understands that some districts have sought to avoid unnecessary additional paperwork by adapting their current disciplinary referral forms to include checkboxes or creating similar “user-friendly” formats for school employees to report challenging behavior involving discipline.  

That said, once the School Climate Specialist is notified of challenging behavior – whether through a checkbox on a disciplinary referral form, a formal complaint submitted by a student, parent, or school employee, or some other process – the School Climate Specialist must assess the facts, severity, and intentionality of the behavior.  This is where the seriousness of the infraction comes into play. In some circumstances, this assessment will be quick (and may result in a finding that appropriate supports, interventions, and/or restorative practices already have been implemented). In other circumstances, the School Climate Specialist may have to do a more thorough investigation, including but not limited to following procedures outlined in other applicable Board policies (e.g., policies regarding non-discrimination or sexual harassment). 

Finally, as to your question about legislative intent, Legal Mailbag cannot purport to know what state legislators had in mind when drafting this new law, other than to emphasize the importance of creating and maintaining a positive school climate. However, Legal Mailbag is hopeful that if your district (1) adopts regulations or procedures to streamline reporting and (2) helps school employees understand when they have discretion to report, responding to challenging behavior will be less challenging than it has proven to be so far!  

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Dori Pagé Antonetti Dori Pagé Antonetti

Dori Pagé Antonetti is a member of the School Law Practice Group where she represents a wide range of educational institutions, including both public and independent k-12 schools in a variety of education and employment law matters.  In her day-to-day representation of clients…

Dori Pagé Antonetti is a member of the School Law Practice Group where she represents a wide range of educational institutions, including both public and independent k-12 schools in a variety of education and employment law matters.  In her day-to-day representation of clients, Dori draws on her unique experience as a former educator for Teach for America.  This experience, coupled with her time as a hearing review officer for the New York City Office of Labor Relations, allows Dori to analyze issues from a practical perspective, which brings significant advantages to her clients.

Most recently, Dori’s practice has focused on assisting school districts and independent schools with various aspects of COVID-19 pandemic response and preparedness and return-to-school planning.  Dori has provided guidance on the requirements and implementation of ever-evolving federal and state laws and guidelines in various areas, such as employee leave, vaccine mandates, mask rules, health and safety protocols, telehealth, and sports-related issues.

Dori is a thoughtful attorney who has astute peripheral vision which allows her to help school clients identify legal issues and develop creative solutions.  She is attentive to detail, careful, and thorough.  Dori has extensive experience in policy development and review, and enjoys helping clients ensure that their policies and regulations are legally compliant, clearly written, and accomplish their intended purpose.  She also regularly advises schools on their obligations and responsibilities under the Family and Medical Leave Act and Americans with Disabilities Act.  For independent school clients, Dori has extensive experience drafting and revising enrollment contracts, faculty/staff handbooks, employment contracts and advising on issues such as truth-in-lending obligations, federal funding, vaccine policies and exemption issues.

Photo of Jessica Richman Smith Jessica Richman Smith

Jessica represents schools in a variety of education, labor relations and employment law matters.  She negotiates certified and non-certified collective bargaining agreements on behalf of numerous public boards of education.  Jessica also represents school districts in labor and employment disputes, freedom of information…

Jessica represents schools in a variety of education, labor relations and employment law matters.  She negotiates certified and non-certified collective bargaining agreements on behalf of numerous public boards of education.  Jessica also represents school districts in labor and employment disputes, freedom of information hearings, teacher tenure proceedings, student disciplinary matters, election law matters, and other legal proceedings arising in the education context.  In addition, Jessica advises schools on education policies and practices, compliance with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act and the Connecticut Freedom of Information Act, and other legal matters arising in the education context.