Listen to this post

Last week, the U.S. Department of Labor issued a final rule to update and revise various provisions of the regulations implementing the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).  The final rule increases the general salary level threshold for exempt employees from $684/week to $844/week (effective July 1, 2024) and then to $1,128/week (effective January 1, 2025), but there are important exceptions applicable to teachers and school administrators. School districts and independent schools should review their payroll practices and determine which employees will be impacted by these significant increases.

Background

The FLSA requires that most employees be paid a federal minimum wage and overtime at rate of one and one-half times their regular rate of pay for all hours worked in excess of forty hours in a workweek.  However, the FLSA provides an exemption from minimum wage and overtime requirements for certain categories of employees, including those who work in a bona fide executive, administrative, or professional capacity.  Generally, to qualify for such exemptions, employees must meet: (1) a duties test, and (2) a salary test (by being paid on a salary basis in an amount that meets or exceeds the threshold). 

Changes for Exempt Employees Generally

The revised rule has the practical effect of expanding the number of employees who will be entitled to overtime pay because they will no longer qualify as exempt employees, unless their salaries are raised to meet the new thresholds.  As an example, an exempt employee who makes $48,000 will remain exempt after July 1, 2024, because they will still make more than $844/week.  The salary test then increases to $1,128/week in January 2025, which is approximately $58,000 per year.  At that time, therefore, such formerly exempt employee will no longer qualify for the exemption, unless their salary level is raised or they meet the criteria for teachers or school administrators, as explained below.

Teachers and School Administrators Remain Exempt

Under federal law, certain professionals, such as teachers, must only meet the duties test to qualify for the exemption.  Thus, teachers are exempt regardless of their salary if (1) their primary duty consists of “teaching, tutoring, instructing or lecturing in the activity of imparting knowledge” and (2) they are “employed and engaged in this activity as a teacher in an educational establishment by which the employee is employed.”  Whether a teacher meets these tests requires a fact-specific analysis that takes into consideration the specific duties performed by the employee, not whether the employee holds the title of “teacher.”

School administrators are subject to a special rule, as well.  If administrators perform “administrative functions directly related to academic instruction or training in an educational establishment or department thereof”, they remain exempt as long as they meet the salary thresholds described above or are paid a salary at least equal to the entrance salary for teachers in the educational establishment.

Next Steps

In light of the new rule, schools should carefully review their current classifications and employee pay. While there may be some school employees who will no longer be exempt from overtime requirements unless their salaries are increased to the new salary thresholds, teachers and school administrators meeting the tests described above will continue to be exempt. More information about the new rule can be found here.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Dori Pagé Antonetti Dori Pagé Antonetti

Dori Pagé Antonetti is a member of the School Law Practice Group where she represents a wide range of educational institutions, including both public and independent k-12 schools in a variety of education and employment law matters.  In her day-to-day representation of clients…

Dori Pagé Antonetti is a member of the School Law Practice Group where she represents a wide range of educational institutions, including both public and independent k-12 schools in a variety of education and employment law matters.  In her day-to-day representation of clients, Dori draws on her unique experience as a former educator for Teach for America.  This experience, coupled with her time as a hearing review officer for the New York City Office of Labor Relations, allows Dori to analyze issues from a practical perspective, which brings significant advantages to her clients.

Most recently, Dori’s practice has focused on assisting school districts and independent schools with various aspects of COVID-19 pandemic response and preparedness and return-to-school planning.  Dori has provided guidance on the requirements and implementation of ever-evolving federal and state laws and guidelines in various areas, such as employee leave, vaccine mandates, mask rules, health and safety protocols, telehealth, and sports-related issues.

Dori is a thoughtful attorney who has astute peripheral vision which allows her to help school clients identify legal issues and develop creative solutions.  She is attentive to detail, careful, and thorough.  Dori has extensive experience in policy development and review, and enjoys helping clients ensure that their policies and regulations are legally compliant, clearly written, and accomplish their intended purpose.  She also regularly advises schools on their obligations and responsibilities under the Family and Medical Leave Act and Americans with Disabilities Act.  For independent school clients, Dori has extensive experience drafting and revising enrollment contracts, faculty/staff handbooks, employment contracts and advising on issues such as truth-in-lending obligations, federal funding, vaccine policies and exemption issues.

Photo of Peter J. Murphy Peter J. Murphy

Peter represents public and private sector employers in a broad array of cases, with a focus on cases involving claims of discrimination, wrongful termination, first amendment retaliation, and other labor and employment disputes. In addition, Peter advises employers on issues such as employee…

Peter represents public and private sector employers in a broad array of cases, with a focus on cases involving claims of discrimination, wrongful termination, first amendment retaliation, and other labor and employment disputes. In addition, Peter advises employers on issues such as employee discipline, disability accommodations, and internal investigations, and provides training and seminar presentations on those issues.